List of publications utilized during the preparation of this website

• Apaydin, F., Akyildiz, S., Hecht, D., and Toriumi, D. (2018). Rhinobase web site.
• Apaydin, F., Akyildiz, S., Hecht, D. A., and Toriumi, D. M. (2009). Rhinobase: A Comprehensive
• Database, Facial Analysis, and Picture-Archiving Software for Rhinoplasty. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 11(3):203–211.
• Armijo, B., Brown, M., and Guyuron, B. (2011). Defining the ideal nasolabial angle. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 129:759–64.
• Asghari, A., Rajaeih, S., Hassannia, F., Tavakolifard, N., Neisiani, H., Kamrava, S., Jalessi, M., and Omidian, P. (2014). Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of healthy iranian young adults: anthropometric and angular measurements. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 28:49.
• Aung, S., Foo, C., and Lee, S. (2000). Three dimensional laser scan assessment of the oriental nose with a new classification of oriental nasal types. British journal of plastic surgery, 53:109–16.
• Aung, S., Ngim, R., and Lee, S. (1995). Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 48(8):551 – 558.
• Bashour, M. (2006). An objective system for measuring facial attractiveness. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 118:757–774.
• Bonfort, G., Nguyen, T. D., Rumeau, C., and Jankowski, R. (2016). Nasal or canthal-alar parentheses: A study of the facial base of the nose. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases,133.
• Brinkley, J., Fisher, S., Harris, M., Holmes, G., Hooper, J., Jabs, E., Jones, K., Kesselman, C., Klein, O., Maas, R., Marazita, M., Selleri, L., Spritz, R., Bakel, H., Visel, A., Williams, T., Wysocka, J., Chai, Y., Samuels, B., and Potter, S. (2016). The facebase consortium: A comprehensive resource for craniofacial researchers. Development, 143:dev.135434.
• Brown, M. and Guyuron, B. (2013). Redefining the ideal nasolabial angle: Part 2. expert analysis. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 132:221e–5e.
• Clapham, P., Pushman, A., and Chung, K. (2010). A systematic review of applying patient satisfaction outcomes in plastic surgery. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 125:1826–33.
• Crumley, R. and Lanser, M. (1988). Quantitative analysis of nasal tip projection. The Laryngoscope, 98:202–8.
• Devan, P., Jacono, A., Strong, B., and Whitaker, E. (2016). Nasal tip projection rhinoplasty. Medscape.
• Devcic, Z., Rayikanti, B. A., Hevia, J. P., Popenko, N. A., Karimi, K., and Wong, B. J. (2011). Nasal tip projection and facial attractiveness. The Laryngoscope, 121(7):1388–1394.
• Edler, R., Agarwal, P., Wertheim, D., and Greenhill, D. (2006). The use of anthropometric proportion indices in the measurement of facial attractiveness. European journal of orthodontics, 28:274–81.
• Farkas, L. and Deutsch, C. (1996). Anthropometric determination of craniofacial morphology. American journal of medical genetics, 65:1–4.
• Gharib, F., AlMahdy, A., and ElBestar, M. (2015). Assessment of nasal tip projection. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 31:105.
• Gode, S., Tiris, F., Akyildiz, S., and Apaydin, F. (2011). Photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue facial profile in turkish rhinoplasty population. Aesthetic plastic surgery, 35:1016–21.
• Gruber, R. and Stepnick, D. (2010). Rhinoplasty: Current Concepts, An Issue of Clinics in Plastic Surgery E-Book. Saunders.
• Guyuron, B. (2012). Rhinoplasty: Expert Consult - Online. Elsevier Health Sciences.
• Harris, R. (2016). Varied definitions of nasolabial angle: Searching for consensus among rhinoplasty surgeons and an algorithm for selecting the ideal method. PRS Global Open, 4.
• Jayaratne, Y. S. N., Lo, J., Zwahlen, R. A., and Cheung, L. K. (2010). Three-dimensional photogrammetry for surgical planning of tissue expansion in hemifacial microsomia. Head & Neck, 32(12):1728–1735.
• Kosowski, T., Mccarthy, C., Reavey, P., Scott, A.,Wilkins, E., Cano, S., Klassen, A., Carr, N., Cordeiro, P., and Pusic, A. (2009). A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after facial cosmetic surgery and/or nonsurgical facial rejuvenation. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 123:1819–27.
• Leong, S. C. and White, P. S. (2006). A comparison of aesthetic proportions between the healthy Caucasian nose and the aesthetic ideal. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive Aesthetic Surgery, 59(3):248 – 252.
• McKinney, P. and Sweis, I. (2002). A clinical definition of an ideal nasal radix. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 109:1416–8; discussion 1419.
• McNamara, J. (1993). Esthetics and the treatment of facial form. Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan.
• Meruane, M., Ayala, M., Garc´ıa-Huidobro, M., and Andrades, P. (2015). Reliability of nasofacial analysis using rhinobase (®) software. Aesthetic plastic surgery, 40.
• Okur, E., Yildirim, I., Aydogan, B., and KILIC¸ , M. (2004). Outcome of surgery for crooked nose: An objective method of evaluation. Aesthetic plastic surgery, 28:203–7.
• Ozkul, T., Ozkul, H., Akhtar, R., Al-Kaabi, F., and Jumaia, T. (2009). A software tool for measurement of facial parameters. The Open Chemical and Biomedical Methods Journal, 2.
• Pallett, P. M., Link, S., and Lee, K. (2010). New “golden” ratios for facial beauty. Vision Research,
• 50(2):149 – 154.
• Park, C., Lee, M., and Jung, Y. (2018). Photogrammetric facial analysis of attractive celebrities using the glabella for planning rhinoplasty and analyzing surgical outcomes. Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 24:105–110.
• Preedy, V. (2012). Handbook of Anthropometry Physical Measures of Human Form in Health and Disease. Springer.
• Rhee, J. and McMullin, B. (2008). Outcome measures in facial plastic surgery: Patient-reported and clinical efficacy measures. Archives of facial plastic surgery, 10:194–207.
• Rohrich, R., Muzaffar, A., and Janis, J. (2004). Component dorsal hump reduction: The importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 114:1298–308; discussion 1309.
• Rosati, R., Dellavia, C., Colombo, A., De Menezes, M., and Sforza, C. (2009). Nasal base symmetry: a three dimensional anthropometric study. Minerva stomatologica, 58:347–57.
• SB, P., Jalessi, M., and Asghari, A. (2010). Management of nasofrontal angle in rhinoplasty. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 12.
• Simons, R. (1982). Nasal tip projection. ptosis and supratip thickening. 1061:452–455.
• Steiger, J. and Baker, S. (2009). Nuances of profile management: The radix. Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America, 17:15–28, v.
• SUH, M. (2018). Atlas of Asian Rhinoplasty.
• Suhk, J. and Park, J. (2015). Nasal analysis and anatomy: Anthropometric proportional assessment in asians-aesthetic balance from forehead to chin, part i. Seminars in Plastic Surgery, 29:219–225.
• Teck, S. R. S., Smith, J. D., and Chan, A. S. Y. (2000). Comparison of the Aesthetic Facial Proportions of Southern Chinese and White Women. Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 2(2):113–120.
• Tollefson, T. and Sykes, J. (2007). Computer imaging software for profile photograph analysis. Archives of facial plastic surgery, 9:113–119.
• Ukoha, U., Udemezue, O., Oranusi, C., Asomugha, L., Dimkpa, U., and Nzeukwu, L. (2012). Photometric facial analysis of the igbo nigerian adult male. Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association, 53:240–4.
• Woelfel, J., Igarashi, T., and Dong, J.-K. (2014). Faculty-supervised measurements of the face and of mandibular movements on young adults. The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 6:483–90.
• Zacharopoulos, G., Manios, A., Kau, C., Velagrakis, G., Tzanakakis, G., and de Bree, E. (2015).
• Anthropometric analysis of the face. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 27:1.
• Zhang, y. and Prakash, E. (2009). Face to face: Anthropometry-based interactive face shape modeling using model priors. J. Computer Games Technology, 2009.